Poker Quads On Board
Posted By admin On 03/08/22John Juanda folded quads at the final table of a recent high-stakes poker tournament. As it turns out, the 47-year-old poker pro made the wrong fold, as his opponent was bluffing.
Nov 21, 2017 Four of a kind is normally an unbeatable hand in poker, and the odds of even seeing quads on the board is a minuscule 4,164 to one (or around.024 percent.).
Poker Quads On Board Members
- Best Poker 'QUADS' - A Poker Four Of A Kind Video!Help us to 65K Subscribers - you are reading this, let us know the most money you ev.
- May 16, 2019 Juanda held 6 6 for quad sixes on a board reading A A 6 A 6, but was in danger of losing to a higher four-of-a-kind hand. He ultimately decided to fold his hand to Sergey Lebedev, who was playing.
- Poker Terms - Common Phrases and Acronyms. In poker, there is practically a library of poker terms that are commonly used. For the uninitiated, these terms can sound like a completely different language, when a poker player says, 'I flopped a belly buster on a rainbow board', when they are really saying that they have an inside straight draw, after the dealer dealt the first three cards, all.
- Poker Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for serious players and enthusiasts of poker. It only takes a minute to sign up. 4 of a kind on board ( texas.
Juanda held 66 for quad sixes on a board reading AA6A6, but was in danger of losing to a higher four-of-a-kind hand. He ultimately decided to fold his hand to Sergey Lebedev, who was playing the board with his KJ.
While Juanda incorrectly folded his four sixes, he managed to bounce back to win the tournament for a $613,600 payday. Juanda now has career live tournament earnings of more than $24.7 million.
The tournament in question was the $250,000 HKD ($31,866 USD) buy-in short-deck no-limit hold’em event. It attracted a total of 65 entrants, building a prize pool worth more than $1.9 million USD.
Check out a video clip of the wild hand that Triton Poker posted to their Twitter account below:
BLUFFEDOFFQUADS!!
Sergey Lebedev makes John Juanda fold Quads holding just a King, playing the board by representing the Ace in the HKD 250k Short Deck Ante-Only event!
Tune in to #TritonMontenegro2019 now: https://t.co/YD58raNsrvpic.twitter.com/jYJJbahJFf
— Triton Poker (@tritonpoker) May 15, 2019
In short-deck hold’em the deuces through fives of all suits are removed from the deck, which does result in quads being slightly less improbable, even through they are still quite rare.
Although Lebedev bluffed Juanda off of the best hand in this particular spot, he ultimately was eliminated in fifth place for $162,500 USD.
Peter Jetten finished fourth for $210,600 USD. This was his fourth final-table finish of the past week, all of which came in high-stakes events at the Triton Poker Super High Roller Series Montenegro. Jetten has cashed for over $1.9 million USD in the series, with his largest score being for more than $1.2 million, which he earned as the third-place finisher in the $1 million HKD ($127,465 USD) buy-in main event.
Jetten earned 252 Card Player Player of the Year points for his latest score. With six final-table finishes so far in 2019 and more than $4.1 million in year-to-date earnings, Jetten now sits in 16th place in the POY race standings, which are sponsored by Global Poker.
Wai Yong finished third for $279,500 USD. This was his seventh career cash, and it brought his lifetime earnings to more than $3.3 million. With Yong’s elimination, Juanda took 10.5 million into heads-up play against Canadian poker pro Daniel Dvoress, who sat with just shy of 9 million in chips.
The two battled it out for around 30 minutes before the final hand of the tournament was dealt. Dvoress picked up the AA and raised to 750,000 on the button. Juanda called with the QJ and the board came down K108 to give Juanda a flush, which beats even a full house in short deck poker.
Dvoress had an overpair and the nut flush draw, but would only make the best hand by the river 13 percent of the time, given that the 2,3,4, and 5 have all been removed from the deck, and the 9 would give Juanda a straight flush.
Poker Quads On Board Game
Juanda checked on the flop, Dvoress bet 500,000 and Juanda called. The turn was the K and both players checked. The 8 completed the board and Juanda checked a third time. Dvoress bet 1,500,000. Juanda moved all-in, having Dvoress covered. Dvoress went deep into the tank, and then made the call before being shown the bad news.
Dvoress took home $410,800 USD for his second-place finish. This was his eighth final table of the year, with more than $3.8 million in cashes along the way. He now sits in 12th place in the POY standings.
Here is a look at the payouts and POY points awarded at the final table:
| Place | Player | Earnings (USD) | POY Points |
| 1 | John Juanda | $613,600 | 504 |
| 2 | Daniel Dvoress | $410,800 | 420 |
| 3 | Wai Yong | $279,500 | 336 |
| 4 | Peter Jetten | $210,600 | 252 |
| 5 | Sergey Lebedev | $162,500 | 210 |
| 6 | Daniel Cates | $127,400 | 168 |
| 7 | Christopher Michael Soyza | $101,400 | 126 |
| 8 | Paul Phua | $79,950 | 84 |
Winner photo: Joe Giron / Poker Photo Archive.
- Posted by kid dynamite
- on July 5th, 2012
In case you haven’t heard, there was a $ 1MM buy in tournament at the World Series of Poker this year. This hand came up on day one, in the fourth blind level. The participants were businessman John Morgan and Russian businessman and frequent poker player Mikhail Smirnov. From poker forum 2+2:
“Phil Galfond just witnessed the unthinkable.
“I’ve never seen a fold like that, absolutely not,” the cash game pro said.
At around 5 p.m. local time during the fourth blind level, Galfond was present to see his table mate in the $1 million buy-in WSOP event, Russian semi-pro Mikhail Smirnov, fold quads on the river to an all-in bet.
According to Smirnov, the action started with Tom Dwan opening to 32,000. Smirnov called from the small blind with the 88, and businessman John Morgan called from the big blind.
The flop fell J87. Smirnov bet 50,000, Morgan called quickly, and Dwan folded.
The 8 hit the turn. Smirnov bet 200,000. Morgan called instantly.
Smirnov said Morgan looked very excited on the turn.
The K landed on the river, and Smirnov bet 700,000, which was more than the pot of 600,000. Morgan thought about it briefly and then shoved for about 3.4 million total, which was about the size of Smirnov’s stack. Smirnov folded the quads face up.
“For me, it was a very easy fold,” Smirnov said. “If he had two kings before the flop he would have re-raised Dwan, because he’s been active and raising a lot. So, two kings was impossible. Two jacks, in theory, was possible.”
Smirnov said that he thought jacks full of eights wouldn’t have been such a confident shove on the river. “He was like all-in, no problem. Before he had been playing very carefully and tight.”
According to his logic, Morgan would have the 109.
The size of the buy-in was not a factor in the decision, Smirnov said. He added that Morgan seemed visibly upset after the hand, giving more validity to the fold.
“I personally couldn’t have done it,” Galfond said. “I’d lose sleep. But, I think it was a reasonable fold actually. There are definitely very few hands John could have had that weren’t a straight flush. Jacks full was probably the one that made the most sense, other than a straight flush.”
According to Galfond, the table erupted once the quads were shown. Dwan left the table in disbelief.”
Now, a few more tidbits for you:
1) Morgan’s reaction, from WSOP.com:
“When pressed for an answer as to whether he actually had the stone-cold lock, a straight flush, Morgan smiled at first. Then, he paused. Then, he spoke.
“I’m not going to tell anyone,” Morgan said softly. “And the reason I am not going to reveal it is totally out of respect for my opponent.””
2) Smirnov’s reaction, from WSOP.com:
“Later, Smirnov was asked about the remarkable hand and his decision to fold a monster (Writer’s Note: English is not Mr. Smirnov’s first language – his comments to Nolan Dalla are printed verbatim):
“It’s hard for me to explain. It seemed like a very difficult call to make. But for me — I think that my read of the table and when you think about this hand and it’s very easy for me to fold. It was the right play. Sometimes it’s very difficult to fold top pair, but this time I don’t know what he should have. It’s impossible for him to have full house of Kings, impossible full house of Jacks, because he did not re-raise from button (pre-flop). He would have re-raised with Jacks and Kings (pre-flop). If he has full house of sevens, then he’d just call (the river bet). A bluff is impossible because he likes to play in the tournament and he is not a professional. I think I have no chance to win, plus he was so excited on the turn (when he made, what could be a straight flush).”
3) Smirnov’s description of the hand, from ESPN.com:
“Tom Dwan from the button raised 32,000, his regular raise. I’m small blind. Call. The gentlemen [Minnesota businessman John Morgan] in big blind called. After this, 7s-Js-8c on the flop. I [bet] from first position, 50,000. [There was an] instant call from the gentleman, and Tom Dwan folded. Then, the eight of spades [on the turn]. Now it’s 7-8-J of spades and 8 of clubs. I bet approximately 200,000, approximately the pot. This gentleman instantly called and was very excited. [He looked] around like all cameras in the world are looking at our hand. I don’t know why, but it is looking for me like this. After this, the king of spades on the river. I bet 700,000, a little more than pot. I over-bet. Five seconds thinking and he is all-in for 700,000 and 2 million. For me, it’s an easy fold. But I maybe thought for two minutes. For me, in real game for example, [it’s an] easy fold.
“I had physical tells plus technically, if he has two kings, he’d raise before the flop because he is a very straightforward player and Tom Dwan raised from button. Only one hand possible in theory, two jacks, but if he has two jacks, I think first of all, he’d raise Tom before the flop, though that is not 100 percent, plus, he would think more on the river because with kings plus straight flush plus two eights, he has [with jacks] only the fourth-best combination. … He should be thinking more about the pot. He was so excited on turn, the king did not frighten him at all. My over-bet did not frighten him, plus before this, he played very straightforward … very tight. He likes to participate in tournament. He cares not about money. … All together, I think [it’s an] easy fold.
“He was very upset after the hand. I think he had a straight flush, but because he didn’t show the hand, someone else [asked] what he had and he wasn’t happy. Maybe now I’m free-rolling in this tournament.”
4) Description of Morgan’s eventual bust out hand, from 2+2 – doesn’t exactly seem like the kind of guy who only shoves with the nuts.
5) ESPN’s Gary Wise talked to Morgan later:
“Wise: Did you have the straight flush?
Morgan: I had a royal flush!
W: There was no royal flush on the board.
M: I had 7-2 of diamonds.
W: 7-2 of diamonds, huh?
Morgan smiled.
W: What did you have?
M: He made a good fold.”
Now, you can read the massive 2+2 thread, with all of the poker hand range analysis you want, and you can spend all day analyzing the possible hand holdings, frequencies, etc etc etc. If you don’t know the players, as almost none of us do, it’s a moot point to some extent: we’re just guesstimating. But there’s one thing that I didn’t see mentioned at all in that entire thread: Smirnov was relying on his read of Morgan – but there’s a problem when you’re trying to get a read on an amateur. First of all, I’m not saying that Morgan is a fool, or a novice – I have no idea – but he is not a poker professional, and everything I’ve read about him points to him being a businessman who enjoys poker. One problem with non-professionals (can we just call them amateurs?) is that they sometimes misread the strength OF THEIR OWN HAND. Thus, as their opponent, you get a false read: you read supreme strength because your opponent is thinking on a different level from you and thinks his hand is stronger than it is!
I remember a very vivid application of this theory: it was a hand that Doyle Brunson played against Chris Monyemaker (I think it was a big televised cash game) where Doyle made a medium flush, and read Moneymaker for supreme strength. What happened is that Moneymaker had also made a flush – a tiny flush – but thought his hand was stronger than it was! I remember watching it, going, “oh no – you can see this happening – Doyle is reading Moneymaker’s overrating of his own hand!” So Doyle mucked the best hand, based on a twisted read: Moneymaker was clearly relaying strength, because he thought his hand was stronger than it was. Doyle picked up on that and concluded that his hand must not be good.
I think that’s key in discussing this Morgan-Smirnov hand…
I think that JJ is a very likely alternative (alternative to the stone cold nuts, Ts9s straight flush) hand for Morgan. I think that KK is certainly possible, although not as likely, since the Ks was on board. And yes, of course he would be more likely to re-raise preflop with KK, but he also may be trying to trap the uber-aggressive Tom Dwan who had been very active. The KK turn call is a little harder to rationalize. I think that AsTs is certainly a viable holding, and would explain Morgan’s “excitement” on the turn, especially in accordance with the Doyle Brunson story I told above about amateurs mis-evaluting the strength of their own hands. Same with 77.
Finally, note that Morgan and Smirnov hadn’t been playing together for days at this point – they’d only been playing together for a few levels.
I’m not folding quad 8’s here.
-KD
Amazon.com WidgetsKid Dynamite is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
View the discussion thread.blog comments powered by